2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 6,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1469 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Cadillac | Sunbeam |
Model | Escalade | Tiger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Size | 6161 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 403 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2609 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 27 L |