2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Escalade | 164 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 403 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 565 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3350 mm |