2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 320 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1747 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Escalade | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6162 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 403 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 565 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 57 L |