2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1992 Volvo 960

To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 6,160 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 258 kg more than 1992 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Volvo 960. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1992 Volvo 960 has manual transmission. 1992 Volvo 960 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: