2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2001 Ford F-650
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1311 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford F-650. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 601 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac Escalade. (565 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 2001 Ford F-650 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Escalade | F-650 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6161 cc | 7300 cc |
Horse Power | 403 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 565 Nm | 1166 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2609 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 4930 mm |