2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 6,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 336 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1139 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Escalade | F1 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6161 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 403 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 565 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2609 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 45 L |