2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 has manual transmission. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | SRX | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 254 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3260 mm |
