2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 836 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 1951 Riley RM A | |
Make | Cadillac | Riley |
Model | SRX | RM A |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2071 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2870 mm |