2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1954 Talbot T 26. (198 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot T 26.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1954 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1954 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
| Model | SRX | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
