2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1956 Maserati 250
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Maserati 250 (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac SRX. (254 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac SRX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1401 kg more than 1956 Maserati 250.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Maserati 250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1956 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1956 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 1956 Maserati 250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | SRX | 250 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2071 kg | 670 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2290 mm |