2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1401 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | SRX | 16 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2260 mm |
