2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 961 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | SRX | Munga |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 254 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 68 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2071 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 31 L |
