2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1963 MG 1100
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac SRX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 1963 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Cadillac | MG |
| Model | SRX | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 254 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
