2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 874 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (344 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | SRX | 220 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 344 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 45 L |