2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1965 DKW F 102
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP) has 193 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac SRX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102. 2009 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1965 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1965 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 1965 DKW F 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | SRX | F 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 254 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |