2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1983 Toyota Model F
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Model F. (76 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Model F.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 1983 Toyota Model F | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | SRX | Model F |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1812 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 254 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
