2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | SRX | FTO |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3562 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 254 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1300 mm |
