2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 743 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (427 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | SRX | Equator |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3260 mm |
