2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 2000 Volvo V70
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo V70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo V70 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2000 Volvo V70. (138 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo V70.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac SRX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo V70. (220 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 2000 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | SRX | V70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 254 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |