2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 2001 MCC ForTwo

To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2001 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2001 MCC ForTwo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 MCC ForTwo. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 MCC ForTwo. 2009 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2001 MCC ForTwo has manual transmission. 2001 MCC ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac SRX 2001 MCC ForTwo
Make Cadillac MCC
Model SRX ForTwo
Year Released 2009 2001
Body Type SUV Convertible
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3564 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 252 HP 44 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 254 Nm 71 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1550 mm