2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki SX. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac SRX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | SRX | SX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 254 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |