2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac SRX. (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | SRX | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 254 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |