2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 271 kg more than 2004 Suzuki XL7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (427 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | SRX | XL7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.2 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |