2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1511 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
| Model | SRX | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2320 mm |
