2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MPV. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1150 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac SRX | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | SRX | MPV |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3562 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 342 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 75 L |