2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1971 Rover P5B
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover P5B would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 1971 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1971 Rover P5B.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover P5B. (296 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover P5B.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS-V | 1971 Rover P5B | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | STS-V | P5B |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 3528 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 595 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2820 mm |