2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1983 Chrysler Laser
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 373 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS-V | 1983 Chrysler Laser | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | STS-V | Laser |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 595 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2470 mm |