2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1985 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 379 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (90 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS-V | 1985 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS-V | Tempo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 595 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |