2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2000 Ford 24.7
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford 24.7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford 24.7 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford 24.7. (359 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS-V | 2000 Ford 24.7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | STS-V | 24.7 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 595 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2580 mm |
