2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2003 Ford F-150
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 2003 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford F-150.
Because 2003 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford F-150. (338 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS-V | 2003 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS-V | F-150 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 595 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3050 mm |