2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2003 Opel Vectra
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Vectra would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 2003 Opel Vectra. (174 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Vectra.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Vectra. (370 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Vectra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS-V | 2003 Opel Vectra | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | STS-V | Vectra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 595 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |