2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2009 Hummer H2
To start off, both 2009 Cadillac STS-V and 2009 Hummer H2 were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2009 Hummer H2. (388 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2009 Hummer H2.
Because 2009 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Hummer H2. (415 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Hummer H2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS-V | 2009 Hummer H2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
| Model | STS-V | H2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 6162 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 388 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 595 Nm | 415 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2070 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 121 L |
