2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2013 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac STS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac STS-V would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2013 GMC Sierra. (355 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2013 GMC Sierra.
Because 2013 GMC Sierra is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 GMC Sierra. (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS-V | 2013 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | STS-V | Sierra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 595 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5847 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1872 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3645 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 17.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 98 L |