2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1946 Rover P2
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Rover P2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Rover P2 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 1946 Rover P2. (47 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1946 Rover P2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 215 kg more than 1946 Rover P2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1946 Rover P2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | STS | P2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1577 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1420 kg |