2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. (169 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 165 kg more than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1952 Talbot Saoutchik has manual transmission. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | STS | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3160 mm |