2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 165 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS | Crestline |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 3643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2940 mm |