2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1960 Seat 600

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1960 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1960 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 329 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac STS 1960 Seat 600
Make Cadillac Seat
Model STS 600
Year Released 2009 1960
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3599 cc 598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 302 HP 19 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 40 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 575 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 3300 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1390 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2010 mm