2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1963 Citroen DS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 315 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 1963 Citroen DS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | STS | DS |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1911 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |
