2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 920 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU 1000 C has manual transmission. 1963 NSU 1000 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac STS 1963 NSU 1000 C
Make Cadillac NSU
Model STS 1000 C
Year Released 2009 1963
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3600 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 302 HP 39 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 69 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 3.7:1 7.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 640 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 3790 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 44 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]