2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1963 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (300 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 752 kg more than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (273 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1963 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Cadillac | Sunbeam |
Model | STS | Alpine |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 273 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 40 L |