2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1964 Citroen Ami
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 1964 Citroen Ami | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | STS | Ami |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 602 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 113 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 25 L |
