2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,474 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
| Model | STS | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 4474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
