2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 390 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | STS | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 3.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |
