2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 525 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 1965 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | STS | Munga |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3599 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 31 L |
