2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1966 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (44 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 600 kg more than 1966 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1966 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Cadillac | Wartburg |
Model | STS | 312 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 369 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 3.7:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |