2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1968 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1968 Mercury Cougar. (194 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 40 kg more than 2009 Cadillac STS.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mercury Cougar. (297 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mercury Cougar.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac STS 1968 Mercury Cougar
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model STS Cougar
Year Released 2009 1968
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3600 cc 5769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 302 HP 194 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 297 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2830 mm