2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1972 ZIL 114. (296 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1972 ZIL 114. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1540 kg more than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac STS. (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
Model | STS | 114 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 369 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3770 mm |