2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1978 Volvo 66

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 730 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.

Compare all specifications: