2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 865 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | STS | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 4564 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2160 mm |
