2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1991 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (300 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1991 Ford Tempo. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 632 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (273 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1991 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS | Tempo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2305 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 273 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |